Tag Archives: rant

So I am 3L.

Standard

Been a while.  I still think the law school is a ridiculous system but I still managed to survive 2 years.  It’s almost 3 am and I am still wide awake thanks to my PMS.

People usually tell 1L is the worst time, and it gets better in 2L.  Well, not for me.  I would say 1L and 2L years are busy and frightening to the same level.  1L year is tough because you are just trying to get used to the new surrounding, but then the school just doesn’t let you.  They keep throwing all this burdens you have to do, with very little direction.  I don’t know about others, but for me, 2L was a very busy year because I overloaded myself.  I took 5 courses in my 2nd semester of 2L year, two being writing credit courses, which is a graduation requirement for my school.  One of them was not regular writing – an intensive writing course.

Here the inefficient admin chimes in again.  Later in the semester, I found out my friend tried to take 2 writing courses in one semester.  Then the dean didn’t let her to do so, saying it would really increase her workload.  Well, I’m fairly sure the dean looked at my registration anyway but not a word was said to me.  Awesome…

One of those courses were called “transactional doc draft.”  2 credits, sound useful, right? WRONG.  Look, I haven’t really seen any of serious contract document until I come to the law school (to be fair, I saw a few, but it was for translation or to be used as manual for my reporting job).  So logically, the best way to teach this stuff would be
1) Explain a concept.  Or two.
2) Give an example and explain.
3) Make the students to write something similar and give feedback.

Well, I’m in a law school, where the common sense doesn’t work.  Instead, from day one, professor gives us 80+ pages long “model contract” with some “errors.”  That we have to spot and change.  Did I learn anything? No. But it squeezed so much my energy out for a 2 credit course.

But, on the other hand, the other writing course turned out to be so much better than I expected.  The professor was frigging awesome in a sense that he actually lives in a same planet with us, and talks about real shit and $, not some highly scholastic legal concept that exists somewhere far far away over the rainbow.  About half of the class were part time students, meaning they are actually older and have a work experience.   Plus, the prof lived in Korea and India for a while as a peace corp member so he was one of those few people who knows the linguistic challenge.

I could have done okay this semester, but this one other crazy professor totally screwed up my grade again.  I visited this professor before exam, and asked her whether the exam would be closed book or open book.  Easy question.  And a sane person would answer “yes, it’s an open book” or, “no, it’s a closed book exam.” Right? Wrong again.  Welcome to the law school.  Her answer was: “Well, it’s an open book but not really an open book, because the time is limited and you need to know the rules in your head.”

….So does that mean open book or closed book?  I have no fucking idea.  And I speak English well.  Then she never made it clear in class anyway: all I heard from the class was some classmates whispering, “I heard it was part open book and part closed book for last semester.”  Well, then, what should I do?  Prepare the worst.  So I prepared it as if I would do for a closed book exam: forget the rule #s in the exam prep note, and try to memorize the contents as much as I can.

….only to see that the exam instruction saying “it’s an open book test! cite rule #s for a full credit!”  Yeah, thanks so much.  The exam itself was crap.  All of sudden the “driver” in the facts disappeared and “Joe” appeared.  Who seems like the driver to begin with.  Then she nearly failed me (her words: “I could have failed you, but I decided to give a benefit of doubt.” yes thank you for your thoughtfulness, bitch).  Which shocked me, because I actually studied this shit.

Turns out, she simply didn’t give me full credits just because I didn’t cite the rule #s.  Which then shows, she is doing a very, very lazy way of grading: mark off the rule #s, rather than actually reading the answers.  If I remember correctly, she said something like “don’t worry about the rule #s” in the early semester.  And she really should have made what her exam would be like clear.  This was another moment where I seriously considered quitting, only until my tutor gave me an honest opinion: that although my answer isn’t the best exam answer, it really doesn’t deserve the grade I got, and this professor is fucking nuts (“I teach this stuff for living, but I would get confused in her questions, these are just bad, lousy questions.”).

In addition, I didn’t have any summer.  I overloaded my summer semester limit by taking two courses, and at the same time preparing for MPRE.

So it sounds like I still have an awful life.  Which is true, but this post ends with a happy note.

1) I take less courses than before, thanks to the summer overloading and clinic. 
2) I fucking passed MPRE – good enough to sit for bar exam in any state.  So I don’t have to worry about this for next 2-3 years. 

 

Advertisements

Stealing a Bell with Ears Plugged

Standard

Like everywhere else in this world, South Korea is suffering from serious joblessness for young workforces (Gen Y/fresh school graduates).  The companies’ hiring standard is way too high, competition is steep, and whole lot of young workforces are spending their time working on public office hiring exam and teaching certificate exam.  If they are to apply for jobs, almost all of them apply for big-name companies but nothing below that.  Elders blame youngs for not being ambitious and applying only to safe jobs.  The government recently launched a plan, talking how they will expand the number of jobs on here and there for young candidates (bit out of this topic, but this administration has achieved pretty much nothing despite its all-grand campaigns and planning, so they are just desperate).  I read the article, and thought – this won’t do any good.  Do they actually know what the problem is, or are they just turning their back and go for easy instant painkiller?

Click for bigger size - I mean, really, do you want to work 2000+ hours per week?

Young Koreans turn for safe jobs because, first, their parents were victims of Asian Financial Crisis of 1997.  Meaning, the young Koreans witnessed their father, mother, cousin, uncle, aunt getting fired instantly from their jobs after working many years, and big companies collapsing  in a day like a mirage.  Watching this, they learned it is possible to be “abandoned” from your “second family” in a blink, no matter how much you gave yourself to the company.  ㄱRationally, they care much more about job security than other factors.  And what’s safer than public officers and public school teachers?  Secondly, the job satisfaction and working condition here is one of the world’s lowest. I linked the average working hours per week graph.  Many westerners complain about Japan for overworking – well, Japan is nothing compared to South Korea.  Many of this extraneous working hour is caused by noonchee (reading the air) and social hierarchy.  Basically, you cannot leave your office before your boss (if you are obviously foreign-looking, this may not apply to you).  Even if your boss says there is no help needed and all is fine, you really should not.  The moment you do so, you will be secretly labeled as “the impolite brat,” and expect your employer evaluation to suck, even though you did a good job on your project.  So you stay and stay before your boss leaves the office at 11 pm.   In other cases, your boss assigns some impossible work at 4:30 pm, intentionally, so you all can use the company’s money for dinner.  Usually, for occasions like this means the hweshik is coming (social drinking), which can cause some serious trouble if you bail out.  In any way, your time in office is forever extended with not much productivity.  Of course you don’t have time to spend with your family.  Sometimes you have to be in office on weekends, just because your boss texted you saying “hey, I’ll be in the office today.”  Even if you have nothing to do, you have to go there so you don’t make your boss as an enemy.  Despite this huge sacrifice of your health and privacy, there’s not much job security, and the hiring practices here are not flexible.  Many job descriptions here do put age/gender limit openly.

Blue collar works are worse than abovementioned white-collar work.  Everything same, just add no social respect, no credit for experience and lower average income.  If you look at US or many other industrialized countries, blue-collar workers might start with lower salary than white-collar workers, but as their experience gathers up, your salary rises pretty nicely.  It doesn’t really happen here.  Who would want to be blue-collar worker here, let alone the white-collar worker?

Then there is another question – why do these young people run to the big name company jobs, despite such low satisfaction and extreme working hours?  It is simple – they are choosing lesser evil.  While many western countries (and Japan) regard written contract as base of everything and standard manual, Korean business culture tend to see written contract as just a piece of paper a loose agreement/sign of two parties agreed to work together.  Due to the globalizing market, this is not so in foreign-Korean contract relationship.  However, in domestic it still is.  A friend of mine received thick employer contract from well-known Korean company.  Since it was thick, she said to her soon-to-be-boss “can I take it to my home and review it with a lawyer, and then sign it?  I don’t think it’s fair that you get to discuss it with lawyer beforehand.”  Her soon-to-be-boss, rolled his eyes and said “What for? Everyone just sign on it.”

It's all about looking good, baby

Strictly following contract is often seen as cold and inhumane.  Unfortunately, such lack of weight on contact often leads to one party leaching another party – especially in work outsourcing or employer-employee relationship.  There is more possibility of you not getting paid on time, taken advantage of, fired instantly without proper procedure, one party canceling order with no early notice, etc.  Such problem occurs to lesser degree in bigger companies.  In other words, at least you are getting paid on time and it gives a safety barrier in terms of social respect – everything is about “looking good” in Korea.   In small to medium-sized companies, not getting paid on time is not hard to find.  Big companies are known for taking advantage of their outsourcing companies and not keeping the contract.  The contractors don’t even dare to sue or change the contract.  They know what will come next from big companies.

In my opinion, the government really should cut the crap out of job expansion program and “the fair society.”  What they need to do is (and probably the fastest solution to all problems)  is ensuring that all contracts are to be written in detail and followed accordingly.  In that way, small-sized companies don’t have to suffer big companies exploitation, employers no longer have to bear unfair working hours (probably), getting paid on time, able to work according to plan, less back-door hidden pressures, and most importantly, thanks to all these outcomes, young Koreans will not do chicken race to the slim door of big name companies, public offices and public school teaching positions.  There are just too many free-ride attempts going on, instead of properly giving credit and pay for the service you get.  You get what you pay for.  Why should demanding proper credit for your service should be a difficult topic?  I think the government probably know what is the main problem, but they just want to show off without their hands getting dirty.  Seriously, just stop playing with the numbers and blaming all on young people.  Shoes off, and get your hands dirty.  Otherwise, the government is just a pathetic thief stealing a bell with its ears plugged.

Another suggestion is, take a full control over public education – do it like Singapore and Europe.  Adapt a well-standardized government test, and only people who pass it go to college and study academic stuff.  The rest goes to vocational training.  Unless the government takes total control on this, the crazy obsession about my-kids-have-to-go-to-good-college-and-be-succesful will never go away.  Back in 70’s, the government easily granted any kind of college establishment approval.  Now there are too many college graduates, yet given the size of this country, there is just not enough capacity to take them all.

By the way, my friend Akli mentioned a lot of these on his recent opinion letter to JoongAng Daily, but of course, given that this is Korea and people don’t like whatever that makes this country looks “bad,” many parts of his original text was edited out.  I’m not surprised.